Picture
              Many good Catholic women have been well enough informed of the evils of feminism, especially in the evils it produced against the pro-life movement, that they would say they are not for feminism. Yet, in our modern environment of: non-classical education (ie no training of reason and logic), egalitarianism, two income homes, intense materialist media, and other influences, many women might be truly blind to how feminist they actually are.  

              Feminist ideals have insinuated themselves in the minds of Catholic women in many areas of life.  Many find that while they say they are staunchly pro-life, they have a growing sympathy for the use of contraception or even a contraceptive attitude toward NFP.  Or, how many women are trained and inclined to find clothes for themselves that are fashionable, attractive, or on the sexy side rather than clothes that are dignified, beautiful and modest.  Egalitarianism has also seemed to overshadow a proper Catholic understanding of social concerns like; familial hierarchy, the just wage, knowing how to properly relate to men (and women for that matter) and rearing children.

A key area where feminism has really seemed to infiltrate nearly unnoticed for good Catholic women is in home-making, the traditional and historical realm of a woman’s competency.  A good many public or private school educated, college grad, Catholic women find those first few years of home life more difficult than they had expected.  There are those who can put off this unpleasant experience by working until the first little one comes along, then the decision to be home comes up again.  Does she go back to work?  For all married women, this being home comes up.  These women have been out of the home nearly all day, every day since they were five years old entering Kindergarten.  This being home is very, very different from anything they have known previously.  They can straddle the fence and just be very active and involved in a million and one “good things” outside the home and still run the home, but on observation it seems that this produces pretty unrealistic expectations on the mom and continued dissatisfaction in home life for the whole family.  The world surrounds and fills one’s life with distractions.  These distractions help numb from some pain and distract from carry ones cross, but then a woman is also numbed and distracted from the Resurrection; here the resurrection of one’s true gift of womanhood.

So a woman chooses to be a homemaker.  She decides to embrace caring for family and home, at home, and be dedicated to it.  Even for the woman that chooses this wonderful vocation those first few years are tough.  It requires a shaking off of so many ideas and influences that she has been programmed to have.  It requires self training in being person oriented instead of task oriented.  It requires re-learning and re-feeling what a wonderful thing it is to be a woman.  She must re-form herself to be reacquainted with feminine qualities that should, but have not previously, come naturally.  Alice Von Hildebrand, in her book The Privilege of Being a Woman ,  illustrates this natural tendency of women to be person rather than thing or task oriented, by imagining a scene where in a room there is a baby in a bassinette on one side and a new computer on the other.  As a crowd enters the room the men will almost inevitably be drawn to the new computer and women to the baby.  It would be interesting to set up this scenario now, and see if there is a modern shift in the results.

  St. Paul says to “put on the new man”.  For men, the action of conversion is in the willful taking on of an ideal outside of himself.  For a woman, it is not exactly the same.  It is more a matter of allowing the natural maternal and nurturing qualities to be felt and purified by grace.  Perhaps, however, for those thus tainted by feminism, conversion will actually require a “putting on of the new woman” first before it becomes natural.  Holding the ideal woman, Our Blessed Mother, before the mind’s eye and being truly dedicated to imitating her is of great importance, along with trusting that God’s grace will be provided for this good work of the soul. 

       Now the fun starts. Now, after the hard and strong decision has been made to be home, to be home loving, and regain true femininity, the mists diminish and little things that once sounded like unfamiliar mysteries in old novels start to make sense.   Honing in on these new treasures, a woman unpacks and enjoys a new interior yet ageless wealth of quiet yet kindled joy.  It’s as if veils have been lifted and the once mundane becomes extraordinary.   The hard work of sometimes taking “self” by the throat and practicing willful submission to a husband, paradoxically gains a woman such respect and confidence from her husband that he gives her the look that says “You make me want to be a better man.”  The old task, of doing the dishes, becomes a “happy place” of warmth, cleanliness and reflection.  Teaching ones child to read becomes an opportunity to take a peek into the window of another humans mind.  Doing laundry becomes a way to tend to the dignity of the people in the home.   The preparation and little touches one makes to the living room to provide for a comfortable, beautiful place to be together offers an indescribable sense of welcome, peace, love and security.  At home, the monastic practice of anticipating a brother’s need can be brought to another level to even anticipating a family’s innocent wants.  What mysterious fulfillment!  Discipline needs to keep one doing ones duty, but in the duty’s can be found a veritable fairy land.  What hope may women have of a full and fulfilling life in this world and the next by an embracing of true Catholic womanhood!

 


Comments

E
05/17/2011 13:38

This post is so true! From the time I went to preschool, I was taught and groomed for a career outside the home. But, now that I am home, I found that I do find peace in the ordinary chores around the home and have realized that it is my true vocation.

Reply
Catherine Alexander
06/12/2011 21:13

I consider myself to be an orthodox Catholic woman. I do not see feminism as intrinsically evil or even bad; it is RADICAL feminism that is the problem. The early feminists were pro-life Christian women, and it is lesbian pro-abortion women who have hijacked what began as legitimate activism.

A big part of the problem is, and always has been, that even women who love being at home occasionally want and need a break. They want and need a chance to be around other adults their own age, and to talk about adult subjects -- politics, culture, religion, art, music, science. If they have a husband who calls it "babysitting" to help with the care of his own children, or believes that his wife is morally obliged to bear as many children as her fertility can produce, she never gets that opportunity. That isn't homemaking. That's slavery.

And it isn't just women who support working outside the home. Many a husband (and his mother) demand that a wife have employment to support his income. I know several women who would love to stay home with their children but their husbands are adamantly opposed to cutting the family budget, and the wife's mother-in-law harasses her for being "lazy."

It isn't always the fault of women that women don't stay home, or don't want to stay home. Can we talk about the ways that men fail women that lead to this problem?

Reply
06/15/2011 00:57

<<<I consider myself to be an orthodox Catholic woman. I do not see feminism as intrinsically evil or even bad; it is RADICAL feminism that is the problem. The early feminists were pro-life Christian women, and it is lesbian pro-abortion women who have hijacked what began as legitimate activism.>>>

I'm curious to know what you mean by "orthodox", exactly.

As far as early feminism, and its supposedly legitimate activism, that is a lie that most of us have had shoved down our throats so many years that it is hard to step back and see it differently from our American, egalitarian perspective. Here's some quotes from those early feminists.

“Housewives [are] an endless array of ‘horse-leech’s’ daughters, crying Give! Give! — [a] parasite mate devouring even when she should most feed [and who has] the aspirations of an affectionate guinea pig.” ~ Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Women and Economics, 1898.

"Sisters of America! Your socialist sisters of France are united with you in the vindication of the right of woman to civil and political equality. We have, moreover, the profound conviction that only by the power of association based on solidarity--by the union of the working-classes of both sexes in organized labor, can be acquired, completely and pacifically, the civil and political equality of woman, and the social right for all."~ Two women, Jeanne Deroine and Pauline Roland, imprisoned for their revolutionary activities in 1848, in their letter to the Suffrage Convention in the United States in 1851, which was read to those assembled

Marriage has ever been a one-sided matter resting most unequally upon the sexes. By it man gains all, and woman loses all, tyrant law and lust reign supreme with him - meek submission and ready obedience alone befit her…from the time of Moses down to the present day, woman has never been thought of other than as a piece of property to be disposed of at the pleasure of man…The discussion is perfectly in order since nearly all the wrongs of which we complain grow out of the inequality, the injustice of the marriage laws.” Susan B. Anthony

I have this much to say, and that is that the marriage ceremony should be cut out. It is useless and has served its day. The marriage service is a poll-parrot affair. No woman obeys her husband. It is positively wicked to use this word (obey) in the marriage contract. Why women think that they should give up their life work simply because they have been married is a puzzle to me. If I were a czar I would unmarry half the people I know.” Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association

I could give many more examples, but that will suffice. I would highly recommend the article http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/theme-articles/you-dont-know-feminism/


Contrast this to the teaching of the Church.

"Mothers will above all devote their work to the home and the things connected with it. Intolerable and to be opposed with all our strength is the abuse whereby mothers of families, because of the insufficiency of the father's salary, are forced to engage in gainful occupations outside the domestic walls, to the neglect of their own proper cares and duties, particularly the education of their children." (Pope Pius XI, "Quadragesimo Anno")

To train their children in the practice of virtue and to pay particular attention to their domestic concerns should also be especial objects of their attention. The wife should love to remain at home, unless compelled by necessity to go out; and she should never presume to leave home without her husband's consent.
Again, and in this the conjugal union chiefly consists, let wives never forget that next to God they are to love their husbands, to esteem them above all others, yielding to them in all things not inconsistent with Christian piety, a willing and ready obedience. ~Catechism of the Council of Trent

“With the decline in religion, cultured women have lost their sense of shame along with their piety. Many, in order to take up occupations ill-befitting their sex, took to imitating men. Others abandoned the duties of the housewife, for which they were fashioned, to cast themselves recklessly into the current of life.” Pope Benedict XV

Again, I could quote many more, but these two are sufficient for a blog post.

And yes, there are men who to their shame encourage their wife to leave their post for the sake of money. That's wrong.(I'm not really concerned about the mother-in-law; if her influence is enough that a woman won't do what is right rather then deal with negative comments from her MIL, there are other issues there). There is a place for the spirit and often the practice of poverty in marriage, somethign Dr. Dilsaver covers in his book and something also covered in several essays in the book "Motherhood and Family"

This is a blog that is trying to encourage me

Reply

Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty article with me. I am apreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great article. Good luck to the author! all the best!

Reply



Leave a Reply